- From: Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:53:21 +0100
- To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Cc: "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote: > Since EME is proposed to be a separate "Extension specification", > isn't what you are looking for just the existing HTML5 and HTML5.1 > specifications ? Something along those lines, yes... endorsing them and explicitly requiring not to use EME... with openness for unproblematic future extensions. This is not as trivial as it might seem at first glance, due to the need to formulate proper, precise conformance clauses etc, and informative text explaining the rationale. But still the modularity of W3C's approach is making this much, much easier than it would otherwise be. Greetings, Norbert
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 17:54:01 UTC