- From: Markus Demmel <az@zankapfel.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 23:07:18 +0100
- To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
Hi, before this group eventually gets closed down... The old blahblah: In my opinion, most of the official chairs accept Digital Restriction Management as a necessary evil, that can bring good to many "artists" Completely understandable from the Viewpoint, that we already have some binary blobs like Flash which are a not so optimal solution in terms of creating and delivering content free of discrimination(like having or not having much money)... but hey never mind, i guess we heard a lot of that already. Back to the subject: What about establishing an official "branded" alternative to the W3 that gives a clear message? To let people accessing the web everywhere know, if it is safe - in terms of: one can go to tons of source code - to view something that meets certain requirements, because there is no confidential/restricted/proprietary/potentiallyevil Code involved? For example an alternative DOCTYPE and namespace which is based upon the works of the W3C until the political / non-political decision to accept digital restriction management, as a topic to be worked upon, from the chairs was made? Or in programmers terms: a fork? (maybe with some later added specs from the W3C) With this, you can easily seperate the good, bad and hopefully the ugly :) as well by viewing the topmost part of a document. So the chairs that support restrictions can have their way and the public, concerned about that, can have their way in a clean labelled fashion. Maybe this can direct some of the attention away from some of the discussions here, which are politically absolutely important, but somehow not very promising and enlightening. That attention could be well used to establish a nice alternative W3C fork :) thus creating something, which is my personally preferred way to deal with such situations. cheers markus demmel
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 15:04:41 UTC