On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > Applying a watermark is a CPU intensive operation, so you're talking
> > about a wholesale change in the physical equipment deployed at the
> network
> > edge
>
> Leaving that aside for a moment though: even in a world where
> server-side watermarking cost nothing, would that be an acceptable
> solution? I.e. would 'big media' accept it in lieu of
> non-user-modifiable client components?
>
Who is that question to ? I certainly have no idea of the answer to that
except that watermaking alone doesn't mean the requirements of any of our
existing content licenses.
...Mark
>
> --
> Duncan Bayne
> ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype:
> duncan_bayne
>
> I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours. If there's something
> urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me.
>