- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:23:32 -0800
- To: <danny@eff.org>, "'Fred Andrews'" <fredandw@live.com>
- Cc: <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
Danny O'Brien wrote: > > My reading of the heartbeat cFc was that it is for procedural > objections > regarding the publication of the heartbeat itself (ie no draft > appeared), not substantive critiques of the content, nor to the > existence of the draft itself. > > If anyone other than Fred thinks that this isn't the case, do let me > know. Mr. O'Brien, I'm sure that we likely do not agree on much around this particular topic, but here I do fully agree with you. JF
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 16:24:41 UTC