Re: Cory Doctorow: W3C green-lights adding DRM to the Web's standards, says it's OK for your browser to say "I can't let you do that, Dave" [via Restricted Media Community Group]

> > > well, nor is it the W3C's position to break them -- insist that they go
> > > bankrupt -- in order to satisfy some idea of purity, either.
> >
> > No-one is suggesting that the W3C force anyone to go bankrupt.  All
> > we're saying is that it's not the W3Cs job to help prop up their
> > business models at the expense of their mission.
> >
> > There are already DRM 'solutions' based upon Silverlight, Flash and many
> > other proprietary plugins and app-store apps.  Those won't go away if
> > the W3C refuses to play ball.
> >
> 
> True enough. And users who want to watch DRM-protected content, despite
> the DRM, will be worse off for it. Users who reject DRM will see no
> difference either way.

Quite possibly.  But making the lives of DRM users better is not part of
the W3Cs mission; in fact, it is in direct conflict with it in many
ways.

-- 
Duncan Bayne
ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype:
duncan_bayne

I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours.  If there's something
urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me.

Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 00:11:01 UTC