- From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 07:00:53 -0400
- To: Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>
- Cc: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 11:00:59 UTC
Duncan Bayne [2013-10-04T01:18]: > So it's no surprise that they're pushing industry interests again today. Just to make it clear because a W3C staff at at that period of time about the patent policy. The end of 2001 was… hot. :) W3C *is* a consortium aka a community of stakeholders. Like *any* community it is widely shaped by its active participants. Saying "they're pushing industry interests" is a truism. :) The debate about the patent policy changed when some W3C members AND members of the open source community proposed a *better model*, the W3C royalty free patent policy. W3C lost a few members on the way. It still creates issues, but we, W3C community, are a lot better with this. In the DRM debate, finding a better thing is key. Some of us can try to change the international law about Intellectual Property and some are trying, but that's a tough fight. I think EME is not a good idea, but that's a negative argument. It doesn't create something. -- Karl Dubost http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 11:00:59 UTC