- From: Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>
- Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:24:43 -0800
- To: Fred Andrews <fredandw@live.com>, JF <john@foliot.ca>, public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
> Duncan, Are you sure you don't mean to be responding to JF, not me? > The majority of contributors to the open web do not agree with you. We > do not interpret the actions of the Director and the W3C as 'not working > on DRM', in fact the EME is an integral component of a DRM system. That's my position exactly, hence my comment above. It's also worth noting, as I mentioned, that JF only considers EME to be 'not DRM' when it's the Director talking about it. The moment he's asking for alternative implementations, it becomes DRM. Funny that. > Satisfying the use-cases is completely irrelevant. We do not want the > EME in its current form and would prefer the work to stop. We will vote > to this end and we have the numbers. The proponents of the EME are > welcome to publish their work elsewhere, but please do not attempt to > pass it off as the work of the open web community. Agreed 100%. > Personal insults are completely inappropriate. Again, I think you meant to reply to JF there. -- Duncan Bayne ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype: duncan_bayne I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours. If there's something urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me.
Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 02:25:09 UTC