- From: Mhyst <mhysterio@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 04:10:12 +0100
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org List" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 23 November 2013 03:10:40 UTC
2013/11/22 David Singer <singer@apple.com> > > On Nov 22, 2013, at 14:16 , John Sullivan <johns@fsf.org> wrote: > > > Except it can and does happen, *in spite* of the subsidies against it. > > We have a fully free operating system, even though it is competing on an > > unlevel playing field against the many incentives governments give to > > the proprietary software approach. > > I think the world would be much impoverished if we only had free creative > content, or only had for-sale creative content. > > (The same is true in many creative fields.) > We keep a social contract with creators (rather with editors, actually) just to have things to entertain or enlight us. I agree with it. But why have it to be all of it encumbered with DRM? Just set a good price that would make paying for the content more convenient than just sharing... and people will pay. And we wouldn't be here discusing this matter. > > David Singer > Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. > > >
Received on Saturday, 23 November 2013 03:10:40 UTC