- From: Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:39:10 -0800
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
> I'm not sure what you think we rejected after an uproar from the > community. W3C was the first to reject patent encumbered technology and > did it under the direction of Tim Berners-Lee. I've retyped this sentence four times now, with each revision becoming progressively more polite. In entirely polite form: your statement is true, Jeff, but omits much. This is how the rest of the world saw the W3Cs actions at the time: ==== http://web.archive.org/web/20020307130318/http://news.com.com/2100-1023-845023.html ... The World Wide Web Consortium works with developers, software makers and others to come up with standards for the Web. Generally those standards either use publicly available technology or get the agreement of patent holders not to enforce their patents. But in a controversial proposal made public last fall, the consortium debated whether to allow companies to charge royalty fees if their technologies are used in a standard. That proposal met with a firestorm of criticism, particularly from devotees of the open-source and free software movements. In a reference draft being published Tuesday, the W3C has moved back to the "royalty free" standard. ... ===== "Firestorm of criticism" is how I remember it too. Do you not see that the same pattern is repeating now, in 2013, with DRM? -- Duncan Bayne ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype: duncan_bayne I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours. If there's something urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me.
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2013 00:39:33 UTC