Re: I strongly urge all supporters to reconsider the EME proposal. It is not in your best interests!

> EME is not part of HTML5, so a browser can choose to not implement and be
fully HTML5 compliant.  Browsers will make business decisions whether they
want EME or not; just as they would make business decisions whether to
include DRM or not (irrespective of EME).
>
I see. So, this made more valid my argument that there will be two kind of
browsers, since don't doubt that at least Firefox and Chromium will not
implement it, both ideologically or because effort don't compense to do it.

> We have many standards that are not implemented in the OS kernel.
>
I agree, but working the W3C on a probably future recomended DRM stardard
for the browsers is like add a DRM recomendation on POSIX specification,
that's totally silly and dangerous.