- From: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
- Date: 28 Jun 2013 11:39:04 +0200
- To: "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
Alastair Campbell: > In the same way the most people use the proprietary h.264 codec to > view video online, the codec is not OS but it is played from OS > browsers/rendering engines. 1. Open Source implementations of H.264 are available. 2. WebM exists as an alternative to H.264 which is not patent-encumbered. I am aware that a very close Microsoft partner states the opposite. In other words: the situation regarding video codecs can not reasonably be used to promote EME. Cheers, Andreas
Received on Friday, 28 June 2013 11:07:34 UTC