Re: What change could we make? (was Re: Letter on DRM in HTML)

> Likewise, W3C might recommend that people use unprotected <video> instead
of EME, if they have a choice, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't work on
EME.
>
That would be a fairly inteligent advice from W3C, at least it would try to
prevent to be used EME by everybody also when it was not required, for
example on free-to-view content available by everybody just because is easy
to add DRM to all files in batch instead of pay atention to allow free
access to this content. If that paragraph is added to the specification,
count with my +1 :-)