- From: Nikos Roussos <comzeradd@mozilla-community.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:53:20 +0300
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Cc: "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org List" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 06:35 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote: > Nikos Roussos [2013-06-26T05:58]: > > On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 05:53 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote: > >> Nikos Roussos [2013-06-26T05:37]: > >>> Nobody talked about obfuscation. > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=public-restrictedmedia&index-type=t&keywords=obfuscation&search=Search > > > > I think the right term here is Encryption. In most of these mentions > > obfuscation refers to the software, not the content. > > My own poor man definition of content obfuscation or more exactly obfuscated content: > > "A content which has been encrypted and where the users do not have ownership of the key for decrypting that content." Nope. That's wrong. Encryption and obfuscation are two different things. That's why obfuscation usually refers to software, not content. But anyway that's the least significant thing we'll disagree :) Regardless of the definitions I think most people in this list understand what DRM means.
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 11:53:59 UTC