- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:38:01 -0700
- To: Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>
- Cc: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 21:38:29 UTC
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > Yes, it is probably more a marketing term. It appears to mean content > > that is owned by people that invested a great deal in creating the > > content and therefore are highly focused on getting a return on their > > investment. > > My concern with the term is that it implies a hierarchy of value - with > that type of content (basically, Hollywood movies and expensive TV > shows) at the top. I don't think it's language we should be using. > It would be nice to have a short commonly agreed term for "content the licensing terms for which include a requirement for DRM". ...Mark > > -- > Duncan Bayne > ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype: > duncan_bayne > > I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours. If there's something > urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me at the above number. > >
Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 21:38:29 UTC