- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 22:30:41 -0400
- To: Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch>
- CC: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org, timbl@w3.org, coordinators@igcaucus.org
Norbert, Thanks for providing input. We value input from all stakeholders of the Web. I understand the concerns as we've discussed similar concerns in the restricted-media Community Group already. Still, the added voice adds to the discussion. I would like to offer several clarifications in-line; even though I assume that this does not materially change the concerns of the Civil Society Internet Goverance Caucus. Jeff On 6/14/2013 7:50 PM, Norbert Bollow wrote: > This is the text of a letter that has been formally sent to W3C. > > > The Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus supports the Electronic > Frontier Foundation concerns regarding DRM in HTML5 There is nothing in the content protection discussion which impacts to HTML5. The HTML Working Group works on several specifications and the one related to content protection - Encrypted Media Extensions (EME) is a separate spec. HTML5 is not affected by EME. > > > Dear Jeff Jaffe and everyone at W3C > > The Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus (IGC) endorses and supports > the formal objection lodged by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) > <https://www.eff.org/pages/drm/w3c-formal-objection-html-wg> . > > We believe that the inclusion of digital rights management (DRM) in > HTML5 has the potential to stifle innovation and seriously compromise > the rights of end users; for these reasons particularly, we object to > the inclusion of DRM in HTML5. > > We fully endorse the arguments raised by the EFF in their statement > "EFF's Formal Objection to the HTML WG Draft Charter". To clarify, the HTML WG Draft Charter neither mentions DRM or EME. All that it states is that content protection is in scope for the HTML Working Group. It is true that EME is the spec that the Working Group is currently working on and we have accordingly published a Draft of that spec. However, this spec has not yet received W3C endorsement or the approval of the W3C Director. > > Best regards > on behalf of the Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus > > /s/ Norbert Bollow and Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro > (Coordinators) > > Internet Governance Caucus > http://igcaucus.org/ > coordinators@igcaucus.org > > > About the Internet Governance Caucus > > The policies that shape the Internet impact not only the development of > the technologies themselves, but also the realization of internationally > agreed human rights, social equity and interdependence, cultural > concerns, and both social and economic development. Our vision is that > Internet governance should be inclusive, people centered and development > oriented. Our contributions to the various forums relevant to Internet > governance, will strive to ensure an information society which better > enables equal opportunity and freedom for all. >
Received on Sunday, 16 June 2013 02:30:43 UTC