- From: Matt Ivie <matt.ivie@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:28:46 -0600
- To: Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>,public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
I completely agree with you. It seems though, we don't have enough money for this argument to mean anything. Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm> wrote: >>> The W3C Mission is to "lead the World Wide Web to its full potential >>by >>> developing protocols and guidelines that ensure the long-term growth >>of >>> the Web" [1]. It is difficult to see how EME (or in fact any w3c >>spec) >>> can defeat that. >> >>But also: >> >>"One of W3C's primary goals is to make these benefits available to all >>people, whatever their hardware, software, network infrastructure, >>native language, culture, geographical location, or physical or mental >>ability." >> >>The *sole* purpose of EME is to interop with closed-source proprietary >>blobs called CDMs. These will most assuredly not be available to all >>people regardless of hardware, software, network infrastructure, and >>geographical localtion. They will probably not cater for those who >>speak non-mainstream languages, and who are physically disabled. -- Sent from my Replicant phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Visit replicant.us
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 00:29:29 UTC