- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:59:42 +1000
- To: "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
On 13 Jun 2013, at 08:14, Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm> wrote: > If those opposed to EME can prove, as I believe we have, that EME is > inimical to the stated mission of the W3C, then that ought to be enough > to scupper EME. The W3C Mission is to "lead the World Wide Web to its full potential by developing protocols and guidelines that ensure the long-term growth of the Web" [1]. It is difficult to see how EME (or in fact any w3c spec) can defeat that. Look at W3C XML Encryption [2] as an example. One could argue that is not very "open" as I can use it to encrypt that SVG graphic image on my website. Some people may choose to do that, others take a different path (and use PNG). However, both seem consistent with the W3C Mission. Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 [1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/mission.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlenc-core1/
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 00:00:09 UTC