- From: Rick <graham.rick@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:33:17 -0400
- To: Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com>
- Cc: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAGDjS3f5vTOkbAowzUyVsYeGcN+7ixzz2tkaDmkZR0WbqkQ7-w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com> wrote: > On 2013/06/07 15:26, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > [...] > > It is now known that the U.S. government is involved in large-scale >> surveillance directed against the world population (PRISM). It is also >> widely assumed that this surveillance is supported by two of the three >> companies which are proposing EME (Google and Microsoft). >> > [...] > > surveillance malware will be added on >> behalf of the U.S. government. The persons involved likely would be >> gagged by a gag order. >> >> It is unacceptable for an Open Standards body to take part in this by >> endorsing EME. >> > > > There aren't many replies to this thread so I will add a "+1" and a remark, > I don't know that there is that much to say. Personally I am overhauling the way I do many/most things on the Internet, since it is clear that any illusions I may have had about privacy are just that, illusions. I certainly will not be running any software on my personal computers that cannot be vetted by the Linux community, DRM or otherwise. I'm even a little nervous about saying that. DRM just took a back door to dealing the surveillance state we all live in. I shouldn't be surprised really. > > Even on a less paranoid level I am persuaded that CDMs will be used to > compromise web user's computers at least involuntarily, just like it is the > case with built-in Root CAs that authenticate SSL certificates (security > flaw that helps things like PRISM). CDMs will most likey be deployed in the > same manner (with hardware built-in modules as a bonus) so that most users > will be trusting a vast array of organisations they've never heard of. I'm > not aware of any other W3C specification that relies on the user trusting > 3rd parties for functionality. > > The worst part is that EME's goal isn't to solve any technical problems to > make the web better, it is a technical problem that attempts to solve > social and legal concerns. > > > -- > Emmanuel Revah > http://manurevah.com > > > Rick
Received on Monday, 10 June 2013 16:33:44 UTC