- From: <piranna@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:40:51 +0200
- To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Cc: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org, Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com>
Received on Monday, 10 June 2013 15:41:19 UTC
> Also, fears are certainly not allayed when those who claim to be > defending to fair use defend such actions as recording rented or > subscription content to play back after the rental or subscription > expires (IANAL but I'd appreciate being pointed to legal references > that support this being fair use) or (in another thread) brag about > their own use of pirated content. Indeed the defense of fair use is > undermined by such comments. > Legislation has always support both cases, at least here at Spain. It's the same case as same years ago record a copy of a rented or a open-to-air or a encrypted pay-per-view channel (Canal +) movie on VHS, or lease a buyed one or give it to a friend after seeing it, or record a CD on a cassette, only that with better quality. Currently all this things have been explicitly legal since at least '80s (although lobbies try to change it with FUDs) and it's social and legally accepted as "fair use" (although we don't have this exact term on our jurisprudence per-se, but practical effects are the same), and just all the DRM platforms violate all this rights we have. I'm not bragging about my use of pirate content, I'm bragging about my citizen rights, by far it's not the same thing.
Received on Monday, 10 June 2013 15:41:19 UTC