> I also find it strange that so many of the people arguing strongly for non-DRM solutions to this problem do not seem interested in developing or experimenting with them. > People is not interested because as I told you, they are not willingly to go against their own rights without at least a huge check in front of them. Anyway, since I couldn't get to sleep tonight, I have been thinking about my proposed AES mechanism studying the use case and the flaws and how to solve them, and the conclusion was that althought it's posible to develop it in a Open Source way using an architecture model similar to SSH and TLS and also allowing personal copies just storing the keys and the encrypted data or registering the computers somewhat similar to Steam platform, the fact is that the weakest slabon is just the computer and the media player, since you could compile your own patched version capable of rip and store the content once it's decoded, or patch it in binary form (this include the closed CDMs) just to allow this, in the same way someone could use a patched browser that removes the limitations on protected media that proposes ACTION 11 and the ones that by definition open browsers will don't want to implement, so with this "open source example implementation" using militar-grade encryption, it's get showed that EME, CDMs and DRM are broken by definition, since as I told you on other mails, the weakest slabon is the user and their own PC will broke always here.
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 09:01:56 UTC