- From: Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:44:26 +0200
- To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On 2013/06/05 16:21, Jeff Jaffe wrote: > On 6/5/2013 8:40 AM, Emmanuel Revah wrote: >> On 2013/06/05 12:17, Jeff Jaffe wrote: >>> On 6/5/2013 5:57 AM, Emmanuel Revah wrote: >> On W3C.org » Standards » Browsers and Authoring Tools -> link: >> http://www.w3.org/standards/agents/Overview.html >> "We should be able to publish regardless of the software we use [...] >> We should be able to access the web from any kind of hardware that can >> connect to the Internet" >> >> I don't know if this is a policy but it is on the W3's website. > > I agree it is not policy. But it is also the case that EME does not > stop publishers from publishing to the Web regardless of the software > they use. And EME does not stop access to the web from any kind of > hardware that can connect to the Internet. Thanks for your clear and on-point replies. It is possible to use EME regardless of the software/hardware, however would it have any functionality in the case of a Free Software + non DRM'd hardware implementation ? For example, img, audio, video, can be used with free or non-free formats (same with software/hardware). Even if only non-free formats existed today, the goal of those tags are parallel to source-code, royalities and format licenses. There's no technical reason for free formats to not have the potential to deliver the same functionalities on a 100% free system. If I understood anything, for EME to be functional, the publisher must have a control over the user's computing. -- Emmanuel Revah http://manurevah.com
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2013 10:44:59 UTC