- From: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
- Date: 2 Jun 2013 22:40:00 +0200
- To: "Mark Watson" <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Cc: "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
Mark Watson: > Sure. I meant that some people would like the W3C policy to refer to > Free Open Source rather than just Open Source. The term "Free and Open Source Software" (FOSS) could or should be used instead of Open Source. But that would not result in any practical difference because all Free / Copyleft licenses are also Open Source licenses. More precise would be referring to the Open Source Definition (http://opensource.org/docs/osd) and the list of OSI-approved licenses (http://opensource.org/licenses). >> Neither Geolocation nor WebGL "basically" require closed >> source drivers. > > I believe they require proprietary hardware/firmware to be performant, > though I could be wrong there. Or this could be true now but will > change in future (certainly it will change when the various patents > involved expire). Well, some manufacturers of 3D graphics hardware certainly make it very difficult for Open Source developers, which resulted in this well known reaction by Linus Torvalds last year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYWzMvlj2RQ But those difficulties are not inherent in 3D. (One main problem here in my opinion is that there are Linux distributions which promote and encourage the installation of closed source drivers for certain graphics hardware and by doing so encourage the hardware manufacturers to continue their bad practices.) *** Maybe someone reading this mail is interested in this: 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison Published on April 29, 2013 Written by Michael Larabel http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd_nvidia_15way&num=1 AMD Releases Open-Source UVD Video Support Published on April 02, 2013 Written by Fatima Sheremetyeva http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd_opensource_uvd&num=1 Cheers, Andreas
Received on Sunday, 2 June 2013 20:52:08 UTC