- From: Nikos Roussos <comzeradd@mozilla-community.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:23:59 +0300
- To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 14:31 -0700, Mark Watson wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch> wrote: > "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Robert O'Callaghan of Mozilla proposed that all CDMs be > registered > > > and that a condition of registration be publication of the > source > > > code > > > > Interesting solution... Independently of the fact I'm > against EME, > > since this would mean a reduced and clearly common set of > CDMs, I > > agree with that solution. > > +1 > > since it would also greatly increase the likelihood of being > able to > run the CDMs on Free Software operating system platforms, > therefore > significantly reducing the risk in regard to the continued > viability > of such operating system platforms that I'm so concerned > about. > > > I see, so this is an area where there could be some advantage to > working on this in W3C then ? Just a clarification. You wrote: "all CDMs be registered and that a condition of registration be publication of the source code" Robert says on this bug: "Documentation must be published describing the complete operation of the CDM" Those are two different things. Am I missing something? Andreas' suggestion on this same bug is also interesting https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20944#c14
Received on Saturday, 13 July 2013 08:24:25 UTC