- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:56:35 -0400
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- CC: Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com>, public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On 7/12/2013 1:53 PM, Karl Dubost wrote: > Jeff Jaffe [2013-07-12T13:48]: >> Yes, the diversity of situations is exactly why I usually simply call it premium content; also because we did not succeed in agreeing on a different word. > (…) speechless ;) > > It is content. Just content. The same content can be protected or not. That is all. It has nothing to do with investment, ownership, etc. There is no need to differentiate it. Perhaps you missed the context of why I introduced the term premium content. It was very relevant to the point I was making. The previous post said that because of EME, there will be more proprietary software available for government intrusion. Maybe I should have said: For those systems interested in acquiring content which is protected, they already have proprietary software on their machine. For those who are not interested in acquiring such content, they will not have EME. So no systems are effected by the existence of EME. > > Once EME/CDM has been applied in the chain. It is just protected content. The same way a content which has ACL on it is protected content. That doesn't make it premium. > > Premium (in the dictionary) > noun ( pl. premiums ) > 1 an amount to be paid for an insurance policy. > 2 a sum added to an ordinary price or charge: customers are reluctant to pay a premium for organic fruit. > 3 something given as a reward, prize, or incentive > >
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 17:56:41 UTC