- From: <piranna@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:34:00 +0200
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org, Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com>
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 17:34:28 UTC
> One way to interpret this remark is that W3C should not have accepted the "content protection" requirement of the Web and TV Interest Group - which of course has been well debated on this list. > And we didn't get consensus, in fact it seems too me that both positions has got more radicalized with stronger arguments, by the way... This it's something that should be noticed and taken in account...
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 17:34:28 UTC