- From: Matt Ivie <matt.ivie@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 08:47:25 -0600
- To: "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com>,Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- CC: Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com>,"public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
I also agree with this. "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com> wrote: >>+1 >> >>2013/7/12 Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>: >>> Emmanuel Revah [2013-07-12T10:15]: >>>> The term "premium content" should not be used in this discussion. I >>don't believe that the W3C should consider different classes of >>content. >>> >>> I agree with Emmanuel. EME is not designed for a specific category >>of content and will not be used (if released) for only one type of >>content. Plus it loads the issue of EME/CDM with a specific cultural >>semantics. We should be thinking about what EME and associated CDM >>create for the exchange of information and the impact it has on our >>society and usage of the Web. >>> >>> -- >>> Karl Dubost >>> http://www.la-grange.net/karl/ >>> >>> -- Sent from my Replicant phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Visit replicant.us
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 14:48:06 UTC