- From: Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:20:25 +0200
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: > On 7/10/2013 7:16 AM, Norbert Bollow wrote: > > What if the kind of architecture that is pursued in the EME spec is > > in fact the best possible solution to the stated requirement, but > > it is still very bad because it is fundamentally incompatible with > > building an open web and ICT systems that provide a reasonable > > environment for the protection of human rights? > > Assuming that the Working Group addresses the issues against the spec What is the appropriate way to bring the kind of “issues against the spec” to the attention of the WG which are not specific to the particularities of the EME spec, but which are in fact common to all kinds of DRM-related systems? I'm asking this kind of concerns seems to be considered off-topic on the WF's mailing list. > and bring it forward to the W3C Director for approval as a W3C > Recommendation, he will determine whether it is appropriate for > approval as a W3M Recommendation. Will there be a way to submit counterarguments for consideration by the W3C director? Greetings, Norbert FreedomHTML.org
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 13:20:48 UTC