- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 09:06:48 -0700
- To: cobaco@freemen.be
- Cc: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAEnTvdDMVw3fRGAP=+Tm0SpA=GD8zp0QeMv7Qe1FqUOTb-TRdw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:54 AM, cobaco <cobaco@freemen.be> wrote: > On Tuesday, Tue, 2013/07/02, Mark Watson wrote: > > Microsoft have announced end-of-life for Silverlight. Do you think that > > when that time comes, if there is no alternative in the browsers > > themselves, content providers will shrug and modify their contracts to > > allow DRM-free distribution of their content ? > > Or is it more likely that another plugin based solution will emerge, > > giving users no choice of what to install in order to view the content ? > > First: users do have a choice, there's always piracy (Big Content may not > like it but that's a lost battle for them). > I meant legal choices. > > Second: DRM is always and inevitably going to be more hassle for the user > then a non-DRM version of the same software/service. > If such an alternative is available, perhaps. We do invest a lot to make our service as hassle-free as possible, though, despite our use of DRM. > > Thirth: DRM is always and inevitably going to be more hassle for the > provider due to the extra overhead of managing the licenses and user > complaints (hey I've bougth a new phone/tablet/computer, now my media > don't > work anymore) > True. This is a good reason to believe that just improving the client side with EME won't drive a significant increase in the use of DRM by providers. > > Given the 2nd and 3th point, DRM content is at an inherent disadvantage. > Consequently in any competition between otherwise equivalent DRM and > non-DRM > content the DRM-content is bound to lose in the long run. > True, but such a competition between 'otherwise equivalent' services is unlikely to happen in practice. At least for video content services competition is mainly driven by content, price and device support. > > Given that an increasing amount of (individual/small) content producers are > _already_ doing the DRM-free thing. The most likely outcome is that non-DRM > will (slowly) reach critical mass, after which any providers sticking to > DRM > are going to find themselves rapidly irrelevant. > > Whishfull thinking? Maybe, but on my part or yours? Time well tell > In the meantime, we'd like to work on improving the technology. ...Mark > -- > Cheers, Cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 16:07:18 UTC