- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 22:37:41 -0800
- To: "'Andreas Kuckartz'" <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
- Cc: "'Fred Andrews'" <fredandw@live.com>, <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
Andreas Kuckartz wrote > > John Foliot: > > The EFF have already filed a Formal Objection to the work around EME > > (https://www.eff.org/pages/drm/w3c-formal-objection-html-wg + > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/formal-objection-status.html), ... > > A small correction: That Formal Objection against EME was filed by > myself, not by the EFF. The EFF had already filed a Formal Objection > against the addition of "content protection" to the charter of the HTML > WG. But it is correct that in my own Formal Objection I for simplicity > do refer to the reasons provided by the EFF in their Formal Objection. Thank you for the correction. The process remains the same however, and Fred's accusation's of inaction and failing to respond remain as groundless now as they were before. It's a shame really that he can't even bother to read the W3C Process document and understand the process as outlined. JF
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 06:40:47 UTC