- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:14:49 +1000
- To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5EA331D8-2CE7-40ED-AC75-01B532101FF0@semanticidentity.com>
On 13 Apr 2013, at 02:34, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote: > Your question is a good one, though: are there alternatives to DRM that would meet the goals of content providers and also address some of the concerns that have been raised with DRM ? There are always alternatives if you can clearly define the "goals of content providers". You could envisage some goals to be awareness-based (ie I just want users to know that this content has these restrictions) right up to the "full" enforcement-based (ie: this content shall only be used this way..) The latter is what OMA DRM does [1] - and the former has been covered in different ways, such as the Privacy-aware Social Web [2] W3C has looked at DRM back in 2001 [3] and today, the latest 2013 W3C eBook Workshop [4] mentions DRM as possible areas of work. I think before we jump to any alternatives, we look at the requirements first. Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Chair, W3C ODRL Community Group http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/ [1] http://technical.openmobilealliance.org/Technical/release_program/drm_v2_1_2.aspx [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/XGR-socialweb-20101206/ [3] http://www.w3.org/2000/12/drm-ws/ [4] http://www.w3.org/2012/08/electronic-books/Overview.html
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 12:15:21 UTC