Re: aspect ratio as an attribute

We *could* but I'm not sure that having the same attribute name that has
two different meanings and two different effects on two similar elements is
such a great idea. Aspect ratio is *mostly* enough for most cases so
sticking with just the one attribute will probably be the least confusing,
unless the plan is to deprecate <img> altogether in which case we can forgo
adding new features to <img> and stick with <source>.

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:03:51 +0100, Adam van den Hoven <adam@littlefyr.com>
> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I was referring to the idea of redefining the height and width
>> attributes to express resource dimensions.
>>
>
> Ah OK. Right, we can't do that for <img>. But we could for <source>...
>
>
> --
> Simon Pieters
> Opera Software
>