- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:25:31 +0100
- To: "Adam van den Hoven" <adam@littlefyr.com>
- Cc: "Steve Claflin" <steve@steveclaflin.com>, public-respimg@w3.org, "alex@bellandwhistle.net" <alex@bellandwhistle.net>, "Paul Deschamps" <pdescham49@gmail.com>, "Yoav Weiss" <yoav@yoav.ws>, "Jason Grigsby" <jason@cloudfour.com>, "Tommy Hodgins" <tomhodgins@gmail.com>, "Jonathan Kingston" <jonathan@jooped.co.uk>, "Hall, Charles (DET-MRM)" <Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com>, "Greg Whitworth" <gwhit@microsoft.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:37:48 +0100, Adam van den Hoven <adam@littlefyr.com> wrote: > I agree with two caveats. First, for better or worse this will break > enough > of the internet that I wouldn't be surprised if the browser guys balked > at > it. "The browser guys" are participating in this very discussion. :-) A new HTML attribute or CSS property typically does not break the Web. Can you elaborate on what you think would break? > Second, you would need to account for srcset; they may all likely have > the same aspect ratio, they will not have the same dimensions. After density-correction, they should all have the same dimensions (modulo rounding errors, at least). > Adding aspect may be a sufficient solution for what we wish to > accomplish. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2016 13:26:06 UTC