- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:21:43 +0200
- To: "Greg Whitworth" <gwhit@microsoft.com>, "Yoav Weiss" <yoav@yoav.ws>
- Cc: "public-respimg@w3.org" <public-respimg@w3.org>
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:27:44 +0200, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws> wrote: > That's part of the authoring requirements, not the processing model. That > syntax is invalid, yet processed just fine. > > The reason it is invalid IIRC, is that in that construct, the <source> > element always gets picked, making following <source> elements and the > <img> redundant as far as resource selection is concerned. Yep. You need to ignore the authoring requirements when implementing; don't infer something the spec doesn't require you to do. :-) Also see https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/infrastructure.html#conformance-classes https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/introduction.html#conformance-requirements-for-authors and maybe http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1140242962&count=1 cheers -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2015 22:22:15 UTC