W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-respimg@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Title of the spec may cause heartache

From: Attiks <attiks@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:37:53 +0200
Message-ID: <CAM7OHzvvQmfJumpZFkaapjRnAtK-fazDQb1xFZpnFyGtb06-dQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
Cc: John Albin Wilkins <john@albin.net>, Christopher Schmitt <schmitt@christopher.org>, Jason Grigsby <jason@cloudfour.com>, Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>, "public-respimg@w3.org" <public-respimg@w3.org>

So your advice is to not polyfill, which is fine by me, but I'll have to
convince others as well. I agree that using it the way we do now might give
the wrong signal, but the concern is that we need to support the currently
available browsers.

Can you repeat your arguments in our issue queue?

Bruce, sorry for the confusion

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com> wrote:

> On 23 September 2014 13:51, Attiks <attiks@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We're using picturefill that adds support for srcset as well, so you'll
> get
> > both.
> ah, well, I didn't know that. That's nothing to do with new responsive
> images in browsers, though.
> bruce
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 11:38:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:06:12 UTC