W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-respimg@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Title of the spec may cause heartache

From: Attiks <attiks@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:37:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CAM7OHzsOd0Rm22cqNVLutNP-CPNrP9UKvV10HNe-oV3xyy5F-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
Cc: John Albin Wilkins <john@albin.net>, Christopher Schmitt <schmitt@christopher.org>, Jason Grigsby <jason@cloudfour.com>, Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>, "public-respimg@w3.org" <public-respimg@w3.org>
Bruce, regarding "This is in "old" pre-respimg browsers", you're right, but
we (Drupal) supports IE9+

Justin: I'm afraid that the catching up will take years, we have to wait
till IE9-IE11 are almost gone, assuming IE12 will have support for picture



On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com> wrote:

> On 23 September 2014 09:43, Attiks <attiks@gmail.com> wrote:
> > if you use an img with src and srcset, the image (src) will be
> prefetched by
> > most browsers, resulting in 2 downloads,
>
> This is in "old" pre-respimg browsers. Try it in a respimg-supporting
> browser, and you'll see that it doesn't prefetch the src image if
> there' s a more appropriate image in srcset. Or, if there is still a
> problem, it's a bug so please report it!
>
> bruce
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 10:38:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:06:12 UTC