- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:30:44 +0100
- To: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>, Frédéric Kayser <f.kayser@free.fr>
- Cc: "public-respimg@w3.org" <public-respimg@w3.org>, Jason Grigsby <jason@cloudfour.com>
On Monday, September 16, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote: > Hi Frédéric, > > If I'd try to "translate" what you said so it'd be better understood by a wider audience, it would something like: > 'JPEG images that can be perfectly divided into 8x8 pixel "boxes" will compress better'. > This is great, and need to backed up by a larger scale research (which is on my todo list :) ), but is also slightly tangent to the issue discussed here. > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the point you tried to make is "The examples we're using are the wrong ones". > If so, I'm not sure I agree. Since many of the images on the web don't perfectly fit MCUs (The 8x8 pixel "boxes"), I think we should test whatever we want to test on a large number of images, extracted from the Web. Some will be a perfect fit, but some won't. > > Let me know if I got it wrong, > I guess related - "Image Compression for Web Developers", published on the 17th of Sept: http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/speed/img-compression/ Frédéric, would be good also to hear your thoughts on the above article.
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 10:31:18 UTC