- From: Frédéric Kayser <f.kayser@free.fr>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:42:22 +0200
- To: public-respimg@w3.org
- Cc: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
If Mozilla is serious about its integrated PDF viewer they will have to better support JPEG 2000 since it is part of the PDF specs. See 7.4.9 JPXDecode Filter in: http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/pdf/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf Current JPX file support in PDF.js (the PDF renderer used by Firefox) is suboptimal. Compare Google Chrome and Firefox rendering of this file: http://fanat1k.ru/tmp/test_pdf.pdf The iBooks reader on iOS devices also displays JPEG 2000 images found in PDF files since iOS 5 (it was not the case before). Hey, PDF is a nice trojan horse! Regards -- Frédéric Kayser Marcos Caceres wrote: > On Monday, October 21, 2013 at 6:27 PM, lists@ericportis.com wrote: > >> I'd love to hear more from browser vendors about why the format never made the cut, historically. > > > Wish I could give that insight, but I'm too new at Mozilla :( However, JPEG2000 is also being discussed as part of the thread about the image formats study: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.platform/9NKc7OeEFLM > > See this message from Henri, who has been with Mozilla for about 10 years: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.platform/9NKc7OeEFLM/4B_JtvpiKTgJ > > Hopefully that helps a bit. > > -- > Marcos Caceres
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 23:42:53 UTC