Re: Reasoning behind srcN replacing srcset and picture [via Responsive Images Community Group] from Marcos Caceres on 2013-10-14 (public-respimg@w3.org from October 2013)

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:02:52 +0100
To: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
Cc: public-respimg@w3.org
Message-ID: <FF06BEA83D2F4037B499B42C400CC767@marcosc.com>

(Sorry about the spam… this is a republication of John's email from the other day - which explains the rationale behind src-n. This is to make it easier to link to for the purpose of discussion.)   

--  
Marcos Caceres


On Monday, October 14, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:

> This post was written by John Mellor. Reposted here from our mailing list for
> easier sharing. By now most of you will have seen and started discussing the
> alternative markup proposal Tab and I came up with, intended to replace both
> srcset and &lt;picture&gt;. Tab's spec write-up gives great examples of how this
> solves the various use [...]
>  
>  
>  
> ----------
>  
> This post sent on Responsive Images Community Group
>  
>  
>  
> 'Reasoning behind srcN replacing srcset and picture'
>  
> http://www.w3.org/community/respimg/2013/10/14/reasoning-behind-srcn-replacing-srcset-and-picture/
>  
>  
>  
> Learn more about the Responsive Images Community Group:  
>  
> http://www.w3.org/community/respimg

Received on Monday, 14 October 2013 18:03:22 UTC