Re: Simplified <picture> element draft

Kornel,

Thanks for your hard work on this, I am really liking the direction. What
do you think browser vendor reception will be?



On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Cory Brown <oh.wise.man@gmail.com> wrote:

> Don't you DARE raise my hopes like that. :)
>
> Here's to cautious optimism and it's desired fruits.
>
> I've had to keep only a peripheral view on the goings on during my
> relocation, so I'll need to pour over this simplified spec and see if the
> x-picture repo needs updating.
>
> Cory
>
> > On Nov 23, 2013, at 6:03 PM, "matmarquis.com" <mat@matmarquis.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Great work, man. Not just this, either—you’ve been on fire on the WHATWG
> list, and it’s moving things forward in a huge way. We all owe you one.
> >
> > Everyone: I’m a Red Sox fan and we take jinxing very seriously, so let’s
> just say that I’m “cautiously optimistic” about `picture` lately. Stay
> tuned.
> >
> >
> > -M
> >
> >
> >> On Nov 23, at 6:08 PM, Kornel Lesiński wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> FYI I've sent a draft of simplified <picture> spec to WHATWG:
> >>
> >> http://geekhood.net/picture-element.html
> >>
> >>
> http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2013-November/041641.html
> >>
> >> --
> >> regards, Kornel
> >>
> >
> >
>
>