- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 15:33:14 +0100
- To: Mohsen Nabiloo Azimi <msnazi@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-respimg@w3.org
On Thursday, June 27, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Mohsen Nabiloo Azimi wrote: > For example, if an image is 2000 by 2000 pixels, but it's resized to 200 > by 200 pixels, browser would not download whole image and scale it down. > It will actually just download enough pixels to cover the area that > image is covering. And likewise, if image is sized to 300 by 300 pixels > browser would download that much "pixels". > > > Have anybody thought about this before? See: http://calendar.perfplanet.com/2012/progressive-jpegs-a-new-best-practice/ http://blog.yoav.ws/2012/05/Responsive-image-format http://opensores.za.net/2012/responsive-images/ Hope that helps! -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 14:33:46 UTC