- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@att.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:48:42 -0400
- To: Cybernetic Communications <cybcom@googlegroups.com>, Laws of Form <lawsofform@groups.io>, Ontolog Forum <ontolog-forum@googlegroups.com>, Structural Modeling <structural-modeling@googlegroups.com>, SysSciWG <syssciwg@googlegroups.com>, "RDF Surfaces (Public)" <public-rdfsurfaces@w3.org>

Cf: Relation Theory • Discussion 4 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/04/19/relation-theory-discussion-4/ Re: Survey of Relation Theory https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/04/01/survey-of-relation-theory-6/ Re: Ontolog Forum https://groups.google.com/g/ontolog-forum/c/vlbILmZMsJ8 ::: Ravi Sharma https://groups.google.com/g/ontolog-forum/c/vlbILmZMsJ8/m/FWbax8syCAAJ <QUOTE RS:> Is there also an attempt at integrating these relation concepts? Like a meta-model of relations? </QUOTE> Dear Ravi, Thanks for the question. I believe I'd say yes to the first part, since integrating diverse concepts is a big part of what's called for here. At any rate, if we are taking about the list of Relational Concepts at the top of the above Survey Page then those are just so many facets exhibited by the family of mathematical objects known as relations. Regards, Jon

Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2023 20:48:57 UTC