- From: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 19:56:47 +0100
- To: public-rdfjs@w3.org
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:18:19 +0100, Ruben Verborgh wrote: > Dear all, > > Thanks for your input on this issue. > We have settled on .termType. > A Term is conceptually a superclass of Node. > For example: a list is an RDF term, but not a node. > A literal is a node, and hence also a term. > > Follow-up question: there's still uncertainty > about the value of the .termType property. > It will be a string, but options include: > > a) Have it the same as the interface name. > Easy, but might be long, capitalized, etc. > > b) Have something shorter, like > "iri", "blank", "literal", "variable". > Faster to type, but needs 2 constants per term type > (interface name and string name). > > What would you suggest? I vote for something, which is close to SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON Format [1] (bnode, literal, ...) > > Your input on this is appreciated by 17 December, > so we can discuss it in the call on 18 December. > Status is tracked on GitHub: > https://github.com/rdfjs/representation-task-force/issues/3 Best, Dominik [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-results-json/#select-results > > Best, > > Ruben Dominik Tomaszuk Research Fellow University of Bialystok Poland
Received on Friday, 11 December 2015 18:59:34 UTC