- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:58:22 +0100
- To: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>, Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-rdfjs@w3.org" <public-rdfjs@w3.org>, "David I. Lehn" <dil@lehn.org>, alex@milowski.com
On 01/29/2014 10:15 PM, Dave Longley wrote: > On 01/29/2014 09:22 AM, Matteo Collina wrote: >> >> >> >> 2014-01-29 ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org >> <mailto:perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>> >> >> Matteo Collina and I work on one of them LevelGraph-JSONLD, I don't >> know if anyone else maintaining packages listed above participates >> in this group. David and Dave also work on payswarm. >> >> >> You work there most than me :). I take credit of the original idea, but >> you are taking it to its full potential. >> >> >> If someone already uses or plans to use jsonld.js as dependency I >> would consider it a good time to jump in and participate in possible >> changes to this library. >> >> Currently I think about proposing something like moving current >> functionality, which includes RDFa and HTTP Signatures to something >> like jsonld-tools (just making up name now) which would depend on >> much smaller jsonld.js (npm: jsonld) focused only on implementing >> logic in json-ld and json-ld-api specs (+framing). At this moment I >> also have impression that some payswarm specific requirements might >> have ended up in jsonld.js (/me speculating) >> >> >> An easier solution is to leave jsonld.js with the full functionality and >> extract the 'core' to a jsonld-core library that does not include RDFa >> and HTTP signatures. Worse naming, but no upgrade issues. It might >> simplify the release of such an update. > > I think adding a "jsonld-core" library is messy and, in the end, will be > confusing. So I'd rather see the extras moved out into their own lib. > Once they are moved out, we can bump the npm version to indicate to > dependencies that there have been backwards-incompatible changes. awesome! with current version 0.1.27 of jsonld.js people shouldn't expect that much stability yet and in long run it can help avoiding confusions in a future... Alex what do you think about releasing green-turtle to NPM? we could help with it if you welcome such offer :) https://npmjs.org/search?q=rdfa BTW I also met @bergie in Berlin in last weeks and we spoken shortly about updating http://npm.im/vie IMOy green-turtle available through npm would also come handy in that case!
Received on Friday, 31 January 2014 09:58:06 UTC