> On 23 Jan 2017, at 10:48, William Waites <ww@styx.org> wrote: > >> BNode identifiers refer to the same BNode, regardless of >> which 'portion' they are in … > > It almost sounds as if you are about to invent an idea of scope, > which one day might be allowed to nest… I am not sure that is where I am heading at:-) What I am saying is that an HTML+RDFa+JSON-LD content would generate _one_ graph (just as HTML+RDFa generates _one_ graph). The rest could be seen as syntactic sugar, in fact… That being said, I am not convinced that it is worth going down that route at the end. Recognizing, however, that a lambda user who may not have a deep understanding of the ins and outs of RDF may find himself/herself puzzled if, say, a namespace declaration in a @vocab element on HTML, or a node identified through _:B1234 is not working properly within the JSON-LD segment. Ivan > > > William Waites > Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science > School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh > Informatics Forum 5.38, 10 Crichton St. > Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, Scotland > > The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in > Scotland, with registration number SC005336. > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Technical Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Monday, 23 January 2017 10:03:54 UTC