- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:31:46 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, RDFa Discussion <public-rdfa@w3.org>
Maybe this is Google's fault for ranking the old (popularly linked?) one first? But if I search for: rdfa distiller ... I get your 1.0 one first, and only if/when it fails do I realise that I should've checked and gone to the v1.1 version instead. Would you consider retiring it and making it more explicit that most people in 2016 will want to be using v1.1? I'm sure I can't be the only one finding the older tool and using it accidentally... https://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/ vs https://www.w3.org/2012/pyRdfa/ cheers, Dan
Received on Friday, 29 April 2016 13:32:16 UTC