W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > May 2014

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Any23 1.0 Release

From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 12:23:22 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGR+nnGr6ceRR6r16bHw5WRMPt1PGU6hJdKF3Ns_TON9eyiJAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, user@any23.apache.org, "dev@any23.apache.org" <dev@any23.apache.org>, Public RDFa <public-rdfa@w3.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
One of the major changes that comes with any23 1.0 is the switch to Semargl
as the RDFa parser. Semargl is 100% compliant to the test suite, so I would
expect any23 to follow suit, unless there is a problem in the Semargl

I just checked, and we have 4 tests failing out of the 170 in the HTML5
category (definitely a great improvement overall though). All 4 failing
tests are negative parser tests. For example [1] should return no triples.
This is any23's output [2]. On the other hand, Gregg's distiller returns an
empty Turtle file [3] (with just @base). I believe there's something wrong
happening when no triple is extracted.


[1] http://rdfa.info/test-suite/test-cases/rdfa1.1/html5/0311.html

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Gregg/Folks,
> The scripts have updated the Any23 service @any23.org, you can now try
> out the tests.
> I've been running some test suites myself and I hate to say it (jynx
> myself) but the preliminary results appear to be dramatically better.
> I am going to make an attempt to expose these results much more cleanly on
> the Any23 site for public viewing.
> Please try them out yourself and pass criticisms.
> We'll be working to make Any23 better... part of this is getting more
> releases and building the community so stay tuned and it would be great to
> see more people over on user@ && || dev@any23.apache.org lists.
> Thanks Gregg for your feedback, this is most helpful.
> Lewis
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>wrote:
>> On May 16, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Excellent; once it's updated, you can either try pointing the RDFa test
>> harness yourself, or feel free to contact me for support.
>>> Running the basic test suite[4] shows you passing only 58 out of 170
>>> tests.
>> Again, based on what version of Any23?
>> We are currently at 1.0. I would however really like to work with whoever
>> runs this service to improve the stats as much as possible... once I know
>> what the stats are actually quantifying and representing.
>> The rdfa.info service is run by the RDFa community; the test suite there
>> is used to determine conformance of processors claiming to support RDFa 1.0
>> or 1.1, which is where the EARL reports used to generate the overall
>> conformance report come from. The any23 endpoint is configured in for
>> informational purposes, along with that of most conforming processors. The
>> overall implementation report for RDFa 1.1 can be found here:
>> http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/
>> You can either run the service by cloning the rdfa.info website <
>> https://github.com/rdfa/rdfa-website> and running it using the run-suite
>> script, or most easily, simply enter the endpoint of your RDFa processor
>> (such as http://any23.org/turtle) and it will be run automatically from
>> the web page. This gives detailed conformance reports for each test across
>> all host languages and RDFa variations. I'd be happy to work with you on
>> this.
>> Let me know if I can help further; it would be great if any23 becomes
>> 100% conformant for RDFa.
>> Gregg
>> P.S., there are also some Microdata to RDF tests at <
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/htmldata/raw-file/default/microdata-rdf/tests/index.html>
>> if you're interested.
>> Thanks
>> Lewis
> --
> *Lewis*

Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 16:53:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:53 UTC