- From: Adrian Giurca <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:00:40 +0100
- To: gig.graham@ontomatica.com
- CC: public-rdfa@w3.org
- Message-ID: <52E8B528.4090303@tu-cottbus.de>
RDFa extractor available as a service: http://getschema.org/rdfaliteextractor/about Check http://getschema.org for examples. Main page contains also HTML forms you can use to test your markup. We also provide running examples you can test and learn from them. -Adrian Giurca On 1/28/2014 10:22 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: > On 01/28/2014 07:12 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: >> On Jan 20, 2014, at 4:59 AM, <gig.graham@ontomatica.com >> <mailto:gig.graham@ontomatica.com>> wrote: >> >>> I am writing to verify that I am using schema.org <http://schema.org> >>> correctly in an RDFa document. >>> I also would like to verify that the document type - host language >>> specification is correct for RDFa 1.1. >>> Rather than splashing the document here, I've posted to pastebin. >>> The URL is: >>> http://pastebin.com/v0Y2Cf3t >>> I have validated the document with: >>> http://www.w3.org/2012/pyRdfa/Validator.html#distill_by_upload >>> and: >>> http://validator.w3.org/ >>> but hope to learn the reaction by and advice from human experts. >>> Thank you in advance for assistance. >>> /g >> >> You might try http://linter.structured-data.org, which can help you >> verify what your markup means. Also, google's webmaster tools. > I would also add: http://rdfa.info/play/ which draws nice tree > representation of your data :) > > -- -Adrian Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/giurca> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/adriangiurca>
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2014 08:01:27 UTC