- From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 15:40:22 -0400
- To: public-rdfa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
Dear all, A bit of an aside... I'd be interested to hear any views on whether it makes sense to try to express the "historical record" of DCMI Metadata Terms [1] -- term-by-term snapshots of information about properties and classes as Comments or Definitions were tweaked, domains or ranges were added, URLs to external documents were updated, etc -- in RDF(a). For example, the "Bibliographic Citation" was issued on 2003-02-15 as an "element refinement" [1]. On 2008-01-14, it was modified with a tightened usage comment, a formal domain of dcterms:BibliographicResource and range of rdfs:Literal, and explicitly declared to be of type "property". (The RDF schema had been saying that for years, but the user-facing documentation had until then used legacy terminology for "term types", such as "element refinement".) I made up this snapshot system for individual term descriptions about ten years ago on the model used to version DCMI documents, which was itself modeled on the W3C method of versioning documents. I have often wondered whether this method is the right one (or at least "good enough"), and how one might express this information in RDF (and for what purposes). I do think it would be counterproductive to generate this document with RDFa for each separate historical version of a term. Simply expressing all of this historical information in RDF statements the status of which would depend on the meaning of "replaces" does not seem useful. Hence my recommendation that we simply exclude this document from the process of embedding RDFa and continue to serve it up as an ordinary, flat Web page, as now. I would, however, be interested to hear ideas on how the historical data might eventually be put into a more useful form. Tom [1] http://dublincore.org/usage/terms/history/ [2] http://dublincore.org/usage/terms/history/#bibliographicCitation-001 [3] http://dublincore.org/usage/terms/history/#bibliographicCitation-002 -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 19:40:54 UTC