- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 23:34:19 +0000
- To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Cc: public-rdfa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:29:43 +0100 Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> wrote: > * Empty span elements to define properties look like a hack. Is > there a better way to achieve the same effect? Well, empty other elements (take your pick: <i>, <b>, <abbr>, etc) - but I'm guessing it's not the <span> you're objecting to! You could replace this: <span rel="nhrefs:role" resource="nhrefs:authoritative" /> with something like this: <span rel="nhrefs:role" resource="nhrefs:authoritative"> (authoritative) </span> > * RDFa2RDFXML doesn't parse this correctly. Is that a bug > RDFa2RDFXML or is this snippet invalid (or border line)? In RDFa 1.0 (which is still the current recommendation - 1.1 is still a draft), CURIEs used in the about and resource attributes need to be wrapped in [brackets]: <span rel="nhrefs:role" resource="[nhrefs:authoritative]"> (authoritative) </span> One other thing you should bear in mind is that while <span /> will parse fine in XHTML, if you want your markup to be HTML-compatible, you should really include a separate closing tag, a la <span></span>. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Sunday, 6 March 2011 23:59:03 UTC