- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:49:10 -0400
- To: Neubert Joachim <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>
- CC: public-rdfa@w3.org
On 03/29/2011 05:50 AM, Neubert Joachim wrote: > Just spotted a minor issue in > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-api/, Section 2.1 > > DOM Orthogonality > > "the name of the method should be document.getElementsBySubject(), which > mirrors the document.getElementsById() functionality" > > A DOM function document.getElementsById does not exist (as opposed to > document.getElementById), and wouldn't make sense, because ids are > required to be unique. document.elementsBySubject is intented to > retrieve a list, so maybe you want to use > document.getElementsByClassName as analogon. Good eyes Joachim! Your fix has been applied to the latest Editors Draft - it'll go out in the next publishing cycle: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-api/Overview-src.html -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The PaySwarm Vocabulary http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/03/31/payswarm-vocab/
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2011 01:49:41 UTC